On 17/06/14 23:53, Daniel Izquierdo wrote:
On 16/06/14 21:25, Ilya Shakhat wrote:
Let me explain how Stackalytics grouping works.
Thanks for the clarification here.
Stefano, given that it's simple to group projects, a
Sorry about this incomplete email u_u. I was trying to wrap up ideas but
well... fat trigger finger
Daniel.
Most of groups are created from the official programs
<http://programs.yaml>.yaml. Every program turns into item in the
module list (colored in violet), for example 'Nova Compute' is a
group containing 'nova', 'python-novaclient' and 'nova-specs'. Every
type of repo (integrated, incubated and others) turns into the
project type, for example 'integrated' type would contain all modules
for a chosen release.
Also Stackalytics has a few custom project types
<https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/default_data.json#L7833-L7879>,
for example 'infra' is every project under 'openstack-infra' git, or
'documentation' which is the group 'documentation' from
programs.yaml. Custom module groups
<https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/default_data.json#L7749-L7778>
are also possible, but actually used for stackforge projects only.
Currently there's no group for python clients, but it would be very
easy to add such group.
Thanks,
Ilya
2014-06-16 21:57 GMT+04:00 Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
On Fri 13 Jun 2014 10:51:24 AM PDT, Stangel, Dan wrote:
> You can also refer to the example of Stackalytics, who have created
> their own hierarchy and groupings for metrics reporting:
>
https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/default_data.json
It's a very neat grouping. It seems to me that the clients are
grouped
with their parent git/gerrit repo (nova with python-novaclient, under
'Compute' program) and Nova is shown alone. I don't see the python
clients individual repositories or grouped: is that correct?
For the quarterly reports I will need granularity because I believe
that clients have different dynamics than their parent project
(and if
that proves not to be the case, we can remove this complexity
later and
merge data).
can you share a concrete example of how you group things?
--
Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Daniel Izquierdo Cortazar, PhD
Chief Data Officer
---------
"Software Analytics for your peace of mind"
www.bitergia.com
@bitergia
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Daniel Izquierdo Cortazar, PhD
Chief Data Officer
---------
"Software Analytics for your peace of mind"
www.bitergia.com
@bitergia
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
