On 19 June 2014 10:01, Giulio Fidente <[email protected]> wrote: > From a the 10.000 feet view, I can imagine people relying on a stable API > for services like Cinder but I don't see how that applies to TripleO > > Why should one try to install an older version of OpenStack using some > 'recent' version TripleO? > > The only scenario which comes up to my mind is the 'upgrade' process where > undercloud and overcloud could get 'out of sync', yet this seems to have a > pretty limited scope. > > A genuine question from a 'wannabe' TripleO contributor, do you see others? > many others?
There are companies (e.g. HP) who're trying to ship products based on TripleO. This means a) elements that are not upstreamed because they install proprietary / value-add code b) elements that are carrying changes that are not yet merged upstream because the velocity of upstream is very low. While I'm not suggesting you should bend over backwards to accommodate such users, some consideration is a reasonable expectation I think, particularly for (a). _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
