On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Charles Crouch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2014 1:52 PM, "Charles Crouch" < [email protected] > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Not a great week for TripleO CI. We had 3 different failures related
> to:
> > > >
> > > > Nova [1]: we were using a deprecated config option
> > > > Heat [2]: missing heat data obtained from the Heat CFN API
> > > > Neutron [3]: a broken GRE overlay network setup
> > >
> > > The last two are bugs, but is there anything tripleo can do about
> avoiding
> > > the first one in the future?:
> > > e.g. reviewing a list of deprecated options and seeing when they will
> be
> > > removed.
> > ++
> > >
> > > do the integrated projects have a protocol for when an option is
> deprecated
> > > and at what point it can be removed?
> > > e.g. if I make something deprecated in icehouse I can remove it in
> juno,
> > > but if I
> > > make something deprecated at the start of juno I can't remove it at
> the end
> > > of juno?
> >
> > That is exactly what we do, deprecate for one release. This was the
> removal
> > of deprecated icehouse options patch.
>
> Ok great, and just to be clear I didn't mean to imply Nova did anything
> wrong here.
> I'm looking for what tripleo can do to make sure it keeps up.
>
> Is there any easy way to see what options have been deprecated in a
> release for
> the integrated projects?
> I guess a list would only need to be pulled together once at the end of
> each release.
>

Yup, if you look at the config file you can generate it will tell you what
has been deprecated.


>
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The TripleO check jobs look to be running stable again today so if
> your
> > > > patch had failures from earlier this week then recheck away (perhaps
> > > > referencing one of these bugs if appropriate). The queue is fairly
> empty
> > > > right now...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all the help in tracking these down and getting things
> fixed.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1292105
> > >
> > > I think [1] was meant to be
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1330735
> > >
> > > > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1331720
> > > > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1292105
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to