On 06/30/2014 03:27 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > On 30 June 2014 21:08, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > >> I am disappointed to realize that Ilya (or stackalytics, I don't know >> where this is coming from) is unwilling to cease making up definitions >> of success for third party ci systems to allow the openstack community >> to arrive at its own definition. >> > > There is indeed a risk that the new dashboards won't give a meaningful view > of whether a 3rd party CI is voting correctly or not. > > However, there is an elephant in the room and a much more important problem: > > To measure how accurately a CI is voting says much more about a driver > author's "Gerrit-fu" ability to operate a CI system than it does about > whether the code they have contributed to OpenStack actually works, and the > latter is what is actually important. > > To my mind the whole 3rd party testing discussion should refocus on helping > developers maintain good working code and less on waving "you will be > kicked out of OpenStack if you don't keep your swarm of nebulous daemons > running 24/7". > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Well I am glad you have reached that conclusion, Luke.
Given that I gave you months of my time with that exact approach and you squandered it away, claiming I wasn't doing enough to help you, I am glad you have finally reached a productive place. I hope your direction produces results. Thanks Luke, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev