3rd party ci names is currently becoming a bit controversial for what we're
trying to do in cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101013/
The motivation for the above change is to aid developers understand what the
3rd party ci systems are testing in order to avoid confusion.
The goal is to aid developers reviewing cinder changes to understand which 3rd
party ci systems are running official cinder-mandated tests and which are
running unofficial/proprietary tests.
Since the use of "cinder" is proposed to be "reserved" (per change under review
above), I'd like to propose the following for Cinder third-party names under
the following conditions:
{Company-Name}-cinder-ci
* This CI account name is to be used strictly for official
cinder-defined dsvm-full-{driver} tests.
* No additional tests allowed on this account.
o A different account name will be used for unofficial / proprietary tests.
* Account will only post reviews to cinder patches.
o A different account name will be used to post reviews in all other
projects.
* Format of comments will be (as jgriffith commented in that review):
{company name}-cinder-ci
dsvm-full-{driver-name} pass/fail
dsvm-full-{other-driver-name} pass/fail
dsvm-full-{yet-another-driver-name} pass/fail
Thoughts?
Ramy
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
