So, our releases will have following versions of releases on UI:
5.0) "2014.1"
5.0.1) "2014.1.1-5.0.1"
5.1) "2014.1.1-5.1"

And if someone install 5.0, upgrade it to 5.0.1 and then upgrade to 5.1, he
will have three releases for each OS. I think we should allow user to
delete unneeded releases. It also will add free space on his masternode.


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> > Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by  "our patches" /
> > "our first patch"?
>
> I mean which version should we use in 5.0.1, for example? As far as I
> understand @DmitryB, it have to be "2014.1-5.0.1". Am I right?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> my 2 cents:
>>
>> 1) Fuel version (+1 to Dmitry)
>> 2) Could you please clarify what exactly you mean by "our patches" / "our
>> first patch"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> 1) Puppet manifests are part of Fuel so the version of Fuel should be
>>> used. It is possible to have more than one version of Fuel per
>>> OpenStack version, but not the other way around: if we upgrade
>>> OpenStack version we also increase version of Fuel.
>>>
>>> 2) Should be a combination of both: it should indicate which OpenStack
>>> version it is based on (2014.1.1), and version of Fuel it's included
>>> in (5.0.1), e.g. 2014.1.1-5.0.1. Between Fuel versions, we can have
>>> additional bugfix patches added to shipped OpenStack components.
>>>
>>> my 2c,
>>> -DmitryB
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Igor Kalnitsky <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi fuelers,
>>> >
>>> > I'm working on Patching for OpenStack and I have the following
>>> questions:
>>> >
>>> > 1/ We need to save new puppets and repos under some versioned folder:
>>> >
>>> >     /etc/puppet/{version}/ or /var/www/nailgun/{version}/centos.
>>> >
>>> > So the question is which version to use? Fuel or OpenStack?
>>> >
>>> > 2/ Which version we have to use for our patchs? We have an OpenStack
>>> 2014.1.
>>> > Should we use 2014.1.1 for our first patch? Or we have to use another
>>> > format?
>>> >
>>> > I need a quick reply since these questions have to be solved for 5.0.1
>>> too.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Igor
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dmitry Borodaenko
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to