On Jul 6, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Rafi Khardalian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All -- > > It seems as though it would be beneficial to use virDomainSave rather than > virDomainManagedSave for suspending instances. The primary benefit of doing > so would be to locate the save files within the instance's dedicated > directory. As it stands suspend operations are utilizing ManagedSave, which > places all save files in a single directory (/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save by > default on Ubuntu). This is the only instance-specific state data which > lives both outside the instance directory and the database. Also, > ManagedSave does not consider Libvirt's "save_image_format" directive and > stores all saves as raw, rather than offering the various compression options > available when DomainSave is used. > > ManagedSave is certainly easier but offers less control than what I think is > desired in this case. Is there anything I'm missing? If not, would folks be > open to this change? +1 Vish > > Thanks, > Rafi > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
