On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Hi all, > > === > tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we > debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code and > consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that Nova > wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first come with > RT as Nova resource in Juno and move ResourceTracker in Scheduler for K, > so we at least merge some patches by Juno. > === > > Some debates occured recently about the scheduler split, so I think it's > important to loop back with you all to see where we are and what are the > discussions. > Again, feel free to express your opinions, they are welcome.
Where did this resource tracker discussion come up? Do you have any references that I can read to catch up on it? I would like to see more detail on the proposal for what should stay in Nova vs. be moved. What is the interface between Nova and the scheduler here? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
