On 14/07/14 16:25, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> I think that I'd probably say there is an expectation that the rescue >> image will be different from the primary image the OS was booted from. > > So every image would now need a corresponding rescue image?
My original comment was on the current state of affairs. If re-using the existing image as a rescue image works for you, there's no reason to change that. However, I observed in my testing that it's not a terribly good idea for the reasons I outlined. If you want to move away from that, though, I believe you could create a generic rescue image which would be good for most/all Linux instances at the very least. In fact, there are plenty of examples of generic rescue images out there already. Matt -- Matthew Booth Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team Phone: +442070094448 (UK) GPG ID: D33C3490 GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490 _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
