On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +0000, Tim Bell wrote: > As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked > as abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the > release. > > Is there a mechanism to keep these specs open for discussion even > though there is no expectation that they will be ready for Juno > and 'defer' them to 'K' ? > > It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along > with losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not > expecting to see code in Juno.
Agreed, that is sub-optimal to say the least. The spec documents themselves are in a release specific directory though. Any which are to be postponed to Kxxx would need to move into a specs/kxxxx directory instead of specs/juno, but we don't know what the kxxxx directory needs to be called yet :-( Assuming we determine the directory name, then IMHO any spec could just be restored placing the spec into the new directory for Kxxxx. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev