> -----Original Message----- > From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:54 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Spec freeze exception] Instance tasks > > On 18 July 2014 14:28, Andrew Laski <andrew.la...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I would like to request a spec proposal extension for instance tasks, > > described in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86938/ . This has been a long > > discussed and awaited feature with a lot of support from the community. > > > > This feature has been intertwined with the fate of the V3 API, which is > > still being worked out, and may not be completed in Juno. This means that I > > lack confidence that the tasks API work can be fully completed in Juno as > > well. But there is more to the tasks work than just the API, and I would > > like to get some of that groundwork done. In fact, one of the challenges > > with the task work is how to handle an upgrade situation with an API that > > exposes tasks and computes which are not task aware and therefore don't > > update them properly. If it's acceptable I would propose stripping the API > > portion of the spec for now and focus on getting Juno computes to be task > > aware so that tasks exposed in the Kilo API would be handled properly with > > Juno computes. This of course assumes that we're reasonably confident we > > want to add tasks to the API in Kilo. > > I see better task handling as a key to better organising the error > handling inside Nova, and improving stability. > > As such I am happy to sponsor this spec.
I also am glad to support this spec. This feature will be nice to investigate gate failures in our future. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev