On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote: > On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is >> really something that should be folded into the QA program. I feel like >> a top level effort like this is going to lead to a lot of duplication in >> the data analysis that's currently going on, as well as functionality >> for better load driver UX. >> >> -Sean > +1 > It will also lead to pointless discussions/arguments about which > activities are part of "QA" and which are part of > "Performance and Scalability Testing". > > QA Program mission: > > " Develop, maintain, and initiate tools and plans to ensure the upstream > stability and quality of OpenStack, and its release readiness at any > point during the release cycle." > > It is hard to see how $subj falls outside of that mission. Of course > rally would continue to have its own repo, review team, etc. as do > tempest and grenade.
Right, 100% agreed. Rally would remain with it's own repo + review team, just like grenade. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev