On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 06:08:52PM +0000, Day, Phil wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'd like to propose the following as an exception to the spec freeze, on the > basis that it addresses a potential data corruption issues in the Guest. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89650 > > We were pretty close to getting acceptance on this before, apart from a > debate over whether one additional config value could be allowed to be set > via image metadata - so I've given in for now on wanting that feature from a > deployer perspective, and said that we'll hard code it as requested. > > Initial parts of the implementation are here: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68942/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99916/
Per my comments already, I think this is important for Juno and will sponsor it. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev