Hi Kyle I do sympathise and know its not easy to accommodate all BP's, and I know it's a difficult job to take these decisions.
May I therefore suggest that anything that gets punted from Juno is "ensured for high priority and acceptance for Kilo Release" ? This means we will have those that are not approved ensure they take high priority and guaranteed for the next release (Kilo in this case) and send an email to confirm this. That way we don't have people feeling constantly disappointed and being pushed further down the pecking order, and ensure they are not being demoted and support on progressing their work at the next release. Interested to hear your thoughts on this Kyle and others and feel free to suggest an alternatives, I know this is a difficult topic to address but I feel it is necessary for us to have this discussion. Alan -----Original Message----- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: July-24-14 9:14 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Kyle Mestery Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Spec Approval Deadline (SAD) has passed, next steps On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Livnat Peer <lp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2014 04:16 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> A quick note that SAD has passed. We briskly approved a pile of BPs >> over the weekend, most of them vendor related as low priority, best >> effort attempts for Juno-3. At this point, we're hugely >> oversubscribed for Juno-3, so it's unlikely we'll make exceptions for >> things into >> Juno-3 now. >> >> I don't plan to open a Kilo directory in the specs repository quite >> yet. I'd like to first let things settle down a bit with Juno-3 >> before going there. Once I do, specs which were not approved should >> be moved to that directory where they can be reviewed with the idea >> they are targeting Kilo instead of Juno. >> >> Also, just a note that we have a handful of bugs and BPs we're trying >> to land in Juno-3 yet today, so core reviewers, please focus on those >> today. >> >> Thanks! >> Kyle >> >> [1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-2 >> > > > Hi Kyle, > > Do we have guidelines for what can/should qualify as an exception? > I see some exception requests and I would like to understand what > criteria they should meet in order to qualify as an exception. > > Thanks ,Livnat > Salvatore sent an email to the list [1] which perfectly describes the types of things we'll allow exceptions for. To be honest, we're already 4x oversubscribed for Juno-3 [2] as it is, and it's unlikely even 2/3 of the existing approved BPs will land code. That's one reason it's hard for me to think of approving existing ones, especially considering how close we are to feature freeze and the end of Juno [3]. Thanks, Kyle [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/040969.html [2] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-3 [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule > >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
