On 07/25/2014 07:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean Dague [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] "recheck no bug" and comment
>>
>>> Would that still allow us to only trigger 3rd party CI ? eg if we do
>>> 'recheck xenserver' I don't want to trigger the main CI, only the Xen
>>> CI.
>>
>> No, the 3rd party folks went off and created a grammar without
>> discussing it with the infra team (also against specific objections to
>> doing so). Such it is.
>
> When setting up the XenServer CI the recheck syntax I added was requested by
> reviewers and I certainly wasn't aware of these specific objections.
>
> Do you have a proposal for the grammar you'd like 3rd party CIs to follow?
Consider: ^(recheck|check|reverify) off limits namespace.
If you want a namespace for commands specific to a 3rd party CI, that
should start with the 3rd party CI name.
^3rd party CI name: command
It should be the official short name in the system so there is no future
collisions issue.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
