On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, CARVER, PAUL <pc2...@att.com> wrote: > Collins, Sean wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:06:06AM EDT, Xu Han Peng wrote: >>> I would like to request one Juno Spec freeze exception for "Support Stateful >>> and Stateless DHCPv6 by dnsmasq" BP. >>> >>> The spec is under review: >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102411/ >>> >>> Code change for this BP is submitted as well for a while: >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106299/ > >>I'd like to +1 this request, if this work landed in Juno, this would >>mean Neutron would have 100% support for all IPv6 subnet attribute >>settings, since slaac support landed in J-2. > > +1 on this from me too. It's getting more and more difficult to keep > claiming OpenStack will have IPv6 "any day now" and not having it > in Juno will hurt credibility a lot. > > IPv4 address space is basically gone. AT&T has a fair amount of it > but even we're feeling the pinch. A lot of companies have it worse. > NAT is a mediocre stop-gap at best. > We've been running IPv6 in production for well over a year. > > Our pre-OpenStack environments support IPv6 where needed > even though we have a lot of IPv4 running where we aren't feeling > immediate pressure. We're having to turn internal applications away > from our OpenStack based cloud because they require IPv6 and we > can't provide it. > > We're actively searching for workarounds but none of them are > attractive. > I've given a spec exception to this, and targeted this work at Juno-3 as medium priority. Given that at the start of Juno we agreed to get to IPV6 parity in Juno, this one falls into the community work area for exceptions.
Thanks, Kyle > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev