+1 to move pycadf to Identity program. -- dims
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Dolph Mathews <dolph.math...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in > scope that seems agreeable to a smaller audience. Most recently, we've > discussed this in both the Keystone [1] and Oslo [2] weekly meetings. > > tl;dr it seems to make sense to move the PyCADF library from the oslo > program to the Identity program, and increase the scope of the Identity > program's mission statement accordingly. > > I've included ceilometer on this thread since I believe it was originally > proposed that PyCADF be included in that program, but was subsequently > rejected. > > Expand scope of the Identity program to include auditing: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109664/ > > > I think this move makes sense. It provides a good home with interested > contributors for PyCADF, and if it makes it easier for the Identity team to > manage cross-repository changes then that’s a bonus. > > Before we move ahead, I would like to hear from the other current pycadf and > oslo team members, especially Gordon since he is the primary maintainer. > > Doug > > > As a closely related but subsequent (and dependent) change, I've proposed > renaming the Identity program to better reflect the new scope: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108739/ > > > The commit messages on these two changes hopefully explain the reasoning > behind each change, if it's not already self-explanatory. Although only the > TC has voting power in this repo, your review comments and replies on this > thread are equally welcome. > > As an important consequence, Doug suggested maintaining pycadf-core [3] as a > discrete core group focused on the library during today's oslo meeting. If > any other program/project has gone through a similar process, I'd be > interested in hearing about the experience if there's anything we can learn > from. Otherwise, Doug's suggestion sounds like a reasonable approach to me. > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-07-22-18.02.html > > [2] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2014/oslo.2014-07-25-16.00.html > > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/192,members > > Thanks! > > -Dolph > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev