On 08/04/2014 05:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/04/2014 10:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 08/04/2014 09:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >>>>> Duncan Thomas >>>>> On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, "Jay Pipes" <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yup. Though I'd love for this code to live in olso, not glance... >>>>> >>>>> Why Oslo? There seems to be a general obsession with getting things >>>>> into >>>>> Oslo, but our (cinder team) general experiences with the end result >>>>> have >>>>> been highly variable, to the point where we've discussed just >>>>> saying no >>>>> to Oslo code since the pain is more than the gain. In this case, the >>>>> glance team are the subject matter experts, the glance interfaces and >>>>> internals are their core competency, I honestly can't see any value in >>>>> putting the project anywhere other than glance >>>> >>>> 2 reasons. >>>> >>>> 1) This is code that will be utilized by >1 project, and is a >>>> library, not a service endpoint. That seems to be right up the Oslo >>>> alley. >>>> >>>> 2) The mission of the Glance program has changed to being an >>>> application catalog service, not an image streaming service. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> -jay >>> >>> Oslo isn’t the only program that can produce reusable libraries, >>> though. If the Glance team is going to manage this code anyway, it >>> makes sense to leave it in the Glance program. >> >> Agreed. Honestly it's better to keep the review teams close to the >> expertise for the function at hand. >> >> It needs to be ok that teams besides oslo create reusable components for >> other parts of OpenStack. Oslo should be used for things where there >> isn't a strong incumbent owner. I think we have a strong incumbent owner >> here so living in Artifacts program makes sense to me. > > Sure, fair points from all. If it can be imported/packaged without > including all the legacy Glance code, then I'd be more behind keeping it > in Glance... >
FWIW, it's already like that. I'm working on the Glance port now[0], which passes locally but not in the gate due to glance.store not being released yet. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100636/ Cheers, Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
