Hi Henry,

Are the fixes pushed with patches [1], and [2], which amend tox.ini,
insufficient?

Salvatore

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109888/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109729/


On 4 August 2014 20:42, Henry Gessau <ges...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Please see this bug:  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1348818
>
> I innocently assigned myself to this bug for Neutron. However, there are a
> very large number of Neutron unit tests that are broken by random hash
> seeds.
> I think multiple people should work on fixing the tests.
>
> We don't want to have multiple people doing the same fixes simultaneously,
> so
> I have created an etherpad[1] to list the broken tests and allow people to
> sign up for fixing them. Please read the instructions carefully.
>
> This is not urgent work for Neutron for Juno. Please prioritize other work
> first. However, there are several "low-hanging-fruit" fixes in the list,
> which
> may be good for new developers. Some of them are not so trivial though, so
> be
> careful.
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-random-hashseed
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to