On 08/05/2014 05:24 PM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 08/05/2014 04:26 PM, Stephen Wong wrote: >>> >>> Agreed with Kevin and Sumit here. As a subgroup we talked about Nova >>> integration, and the preliminary idea, as Bob alluded to, is to add >>> "endpoint" as an option in place of Neutron port. But if we can make >>> Nova EPG-aware, it would be great. >> >> >> Is anyone listening to what I'm saying? The term "endpoint" is obtuse and >> completely disregards the existing denotation of the word "endpoint" in use >> in OpenStack today. >> > > Yes, listening, absolutely. I acknowledged your point in this thread > as well as on the review. Your suggestion on the thread seemed to be > to document this better and clarify. Is that sufficient for moving > forward, or are you thinking something else?
I agree with Jay's concern here. I think using the term "endpoint" at all is problematic and should be renamed to something else. As Jay has stated, "endpoint" is already a well defined and completely different concept in OpenStack. What's being created here should be called something else. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
