That is the beauty of the open source projects, there is always a smartest reviewer catching out the facts that you don¹t.
Edgar On 8/6/14, 10:55 AM, "Sumit Naiksatam" <sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com> wrote: >Edgar, you seemed to have +2'ed this patch on July 2nd : > >" >Edgar Magana >Jul 2 8:42 AM > >Patch Set 13: Code-Review+2 > >All looks good to me! I am not approving yet because Nachi was also >reviewing this code and I would like to see his opinion as well. >" > >That would suggest that you were happy with what was in it. I don't >see anything in the review comments that suggests otherwise. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95900/ > >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> >wrote: >> This is the consequence of a proposal that is not following the >>standardized >> terminology (IETF - RFC) for any Policy-based System: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 >> >> Well, I did bring this point during the Hong Kong Summit but as you >>can see >> my comments were totally ignored: >> >>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZbOFxAoibZbJmDWx1oOrOsDcov6Cuom5aaBIr >>upCD9E/edit >> >> I clearly saw this kind of issues coming. Let me quote myself what I >> suggested: "For instance: "endpoints" should be "enforcement point" >> >> I do not understand why GBP did not include this suggestionŠ >> >> Edgar >> >> From: Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <email@example.com> >> Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 10:22 AM >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <firstname.lastname@example.org> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way >> forward >> >> What I was referring to was also not Keystone's definition of an >>endpoint. >> It's almost as if the term has many uses and was not invented for >>Keystone. >> :-) >> >> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChStatEndpoints.html >> >> Did a similar discussion occur when Heat wanted to use the word >>'template' >> since this was clearly already in use by Horizon? >> >> On Aug 6, 2014 9:24 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 08/06/2014 02:12 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: >>>> >>>> Given that, pointing to the Nova parity work seems a bit like a red >>>> herring. This new API is being developed orthogonally to the existing >>>> API endpoints >>> >>> >>> You see how you used the term endpoints there? :P >>> >>> -jay >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStackemail@example.com >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStackemail@example.com >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev