On 08/07/2014 01:17 PM, Ronak Shah wrote:
Hi,
Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple of
days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following name
changes to the resource.
policy-point for endpoint
policy-group for endpointgroup (epg)
Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and suggestion.
Thanks Ronak and Sumit for sharing. I, too, wasn't able to attend the
meeting (was in other meetings yesterday and today).
I'm very happy with the change from endpoint-group -> policy-group.
policy-point is better than endpoint, for sure. The only other
suggestion I might have would be to use "policy-target" instead of
"policy-point", since the former clearly delineates what the object is
used for (a target for a policy).
But... I won't raise a stink about this. Sorry for sparking long and
tangential discussions on GBP topics earlier this week. And thanks to
the folks who persevered and didn't take too much offense to my questioning.
Best,
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
