On 12 August 2014 10:27, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote:
>> Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so
>> I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work
>> it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates upgrade path.
>> How much work is this? And is that something we really want to spend
>> time on instead of all the other things?
> The fix in Heat is going through the gate as we speak, if that helps:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112936/
> (BTW it would be great if threads about critical bugs in Heat had [Heat] in
> the subject - I almost missed this one.)

Sorry, was thinking this was more a TripleO issue - but I'm glad its a
shallow heat issue instead :)


Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to