On 12 August 2014 10:27, Zane Bitter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote: >> >> Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so >> I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work >> it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates upgrade path. >> How much work is this? And is that something we really want to spend >> time on instead of all the other things? > > > The fix in Heat is going through the gate as we speak, if that helps: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112936/ > > (BTW it would be great if threads about critical bugs in Heat had [Heat] in > the subject - I almost missed this one.)
Sorry, was thinking this was more a TripleO issue - but I'm glad its a shallow heat issue instead :) -Rob -- Robert Collins <[email protected]> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
