This looks reasonable to me, with a slight concern that I don't know what step five looks like... What if we can never reach a consensus on an issue?
Michael On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin <mar...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey > > (Terrible name for a policy, I know) > > From the version_cap saga here: > > https://review.openstack.org/110754 > > I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations > like this. > > Here's my attempt at documenting what I think we're expecting the > procedure to be: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-retrospective-veto-revert-policy > > If it sounds reasonably sane, I can propose its addition to the > "Development policies" doc. > > Mark. > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
