Russell Bryant wrote: > I think perhaps some middle ground makes sense. > > 1) Start doing a better job of generating a priority list, and > identifying the highest priority items based on group will. > > 2) Expect that reviewers use the priority list to influence their > general review time.
2b) Discuss those reviews at the weekly team meeting to give them extra exposure > 3) Don't actually block other things, should small groups self-organize > and decide it's important enough to them, even if not to the group as a > whole. > > That sort of approach still sounds like an improvement to what we have > today, which is alack of good priority communication to direct general > review time. +1 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev