A few of us that have +2 on the global requirements repository happened to be in Chicago last week for LinuxCon, and something that came up over drinks was the fact that it seems clear that the overall +2 group on the repo doesn't have all the background on why the repository got created, or some guidelines that we expect out of new proposed reviews.
I volunteered to take a stab at writing down what I interpret as the background and the standards we should have from my interactions. That review is here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116708 I'd suggest for this review folks -1 for things that they feel are wrong (or missing to the point that this isn't useful if it lands without it). Additional enhancements can come as follow ons. But having a basic upgrade of this readme should help a lot on clarity. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev