How to do we handle specs that have slipped through the cracks and did not make it for Juno? /Alan
From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorla...@nicira.com] Sent: August-28-14 9:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Specs for K release I think it's ok to submit specs for Kilo - mostly because it would be a bit pointless submitting them for Juno! Salvatore On 28 August 2014 09:26, Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com<mailto:blak...@gmail.com>> wrote: You could just make the kilo folder in your commit and then rebase it once Kilo is open. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com<mailto:scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: Hi, is it already possible to submit specs (nova & neutron) for the K release? Would be great for getting early feedback and tracking comments. Or should I just commit it to the juno folder? Thanks, Andreas _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Kevin Benton _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
