Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3.
N. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044669.html On 09/04/2014 01:58 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > Hi team, > > I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find > specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]). > > Some reasons why we may want to grant it: > > First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the > gate race. > > Rejecting it makes little sense really, as it has been commented on by a > good chunk of the core team, most of the invasive stuff (db migrations > for example) has already merged, and the few parts that may seem > contentious have either been discussed and agreed upon [3], or can > easily be addressed in subsequent bug fixes. > > It would be very beneficial to merge it so that we actually get real > testing on the feature ASAP (scheduling features are not tested in the > gate so we need to rely on downstream/3rd party/user testing for those). > > Thanks, > > Nikola > > [1] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/specs/juno/virt-driver-numa-placement.rst > [2] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/virt-driver-numa-placement,n,z > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111782/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev