Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3.



On 09/04/2014 01:58 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> Hi team,
> I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
> specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
> Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
> First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
> gate race.
> Rejecting it makes little sense really, as it has been commented on by a
> good chunk of the core team, most of the invasive stuff (db migrations
> for example) has already merged, and the few parts that may seem
> contentious have either been discussed and agreed upon [3], or can
> easily be addressed in subsequent bug fixes.
> It would be very beneficial to merge it so that we actually get real
> testing on the feature ASAP (scheduling features are not tested in the
> gate so we need to rely on downstream/3rd party/user testing for those).
> Thanks,
> Nikola
> [1]
> [2]
> [3]
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to