I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches...
On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before, but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then necessitated a rebase. For those not familiar with the work, the spec[2] can shed some more light on the scope of work for Juno. All the other patches from this blueprint have merged, the only remaining patch really just needs a +W as it has been extensively reviewed and already approved previously. This may be an easy candidate since Andrew Laski, Jay Pipes and Dan Smith have reviewed and +2'd this already. I am happy to sponsor this, as this is the last patch needed to finish a BP and the patch was approved once bit needed a rebase over some objects changes. The change from the approved version is pretty minor. Thanks, Mike Wilson [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103064/ [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/specs/juno/juno-slaveification.rst _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
