On 09/10/2014 01:40 PM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: > > On 09/10/2014 11:52 AM, stuart.mclaren at hp.com wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> The 0.14.0 client breaks all v2 requests when pointed at a glance server >>> which is running code which is more than a few days old (ie pretty much >>> any production server). >>> >>> There's a band-aid patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120143/ >>> and a longer term patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120300/ >>> >>> What would folks propose we do to avoid having a broken client for >>> an extended period of time (days)? >>> >>> Would merging 120143 and releasing it as 0.14.1 be a reasonable short >>> term >>> solution which would allow less pressured reviewing of 120300? >>> > >> Why do you think landing 120300 will take long? If both patches are >> already on gerrit, I'd rather review the real fix. > >> Is there a reason you think landing 120143 first is better? > > 120300 is a biggish change (several hundred lines) and I was concerned > it might take a while to go through the review cycle. However, the > consensus seems to be to go directly with 120300 -- that it shouldn't > take too long to get through. (And its on-demand schema behaviour is > a nice bonus too!) >
+1 lets go with that! > >> Flavio > -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev