Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-09-15 16:02:04 -0700: > On 09/15/2014 07:00 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote: > > Hi there logging experts, > > > > We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the > > appropriate log levels for http requests that end up failing due to user > > errors. An example would be a request to get an image that does not > > exist, which results in a 404 Not Found request. > > > > On one hand, this event is an error, so DEBUG or INFO seem a little too > > low. On the other hand, this error doesn't generally require any kind of > > operator investigation or indicate any actual failure of the service, so > > perhaps it is excessive to log it at WARN or ERROR. > > > > Please provide feedback to help us resolve this dispute if you feel you can! > > My feeling is this is an INFO level. There is really nothing the admin > should care about here.
Agree with Sean. INFO are useful for investigations. WARN and ERROR are cause for alarm. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev