this would work as well, but wouldn't it require two different API calls?

On 17/09/2014 15:17, Adam Young wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 10:07 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
>>
>> On 17/09/2014 14:55, Marek Denis wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17.09.2014 15:45, Steve Martinelli wrote:
>>>> ++ to your suggestion David, I think making the list of trusted IdPs
>>>> publicly available makes sense.
>>> I think this might be useful in an academic/science world but on the
>>> other hand most cloud providers from the 'business' world might be very
>>> reluctant to expose list of their clients for free.
>>>
>> It is interesting that this latter comment came from the
>> academic/science world, whereas the supportive one came from the
>> business world :-)
>>
>> So maybe there could be a config parameter in keystone to determine
>> which option is installed?
> 
> My thought was that there would be a public list, which is a subset of
> the overall list.
> 
> For non-publicized IdPs, the end users would get an URL out of  band and
> enter that in when prompted;  if they enter an invalid URL, they would
> get an warning message.
> 
> It wouldn't hide the fact that a customer was registered with a given
> cloud provider, but wouldn't advertise it, either.
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> regards
>>
>> David
>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Marek.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to