On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:

> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>> Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here.
>> A couple more:
>> 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what 
>> the goal of it is: Infrastructure Services?
>> 2. We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the community. We 
>> should allow for similar collaborations and group focus to grow up as well. 
>> Storage Services? Platform Services? Computation Services?
> I think that would nullify most of the benefits of Monty's proposal. If
> we keep on blessing "themes" or special groups, we'll soon be back at
> step 0, with projects banging on the TC door to become special, and
> companies not allocating resources to anything that's not special.

I was assuming that these would be self-organized rather than managed by the TC.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to