On 20 September 2014 17:20, Monty Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> At least initially we'll need to do both, since not everybody has Zaqar. >> If we can not have events at all in v2 of the API that would be >> fantastic though :) > > Yeah - don't forget the folks who are deploying heat in standalone mode > who may not have (or want) an additional event stream service thing. They can install Zaqar in standalone mode too, if they need the functionality. I don't see that as a good reason to keep two implementations of basically the same thing. -Rob -- Robert Collins <[email protected]> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
