On 20 September 2014 17:20, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:

>> At least initially we'll need to do both, since not everybody has Zaqar.
>> If we can not have events at all in v2 of the API that would be
>> fantastic though :)
> Yeah - don't forget the folks who are deploying  heat in standalone mode
> who may not have (or want) an additional event stream service thing.

They can install Zaqar in standalone mode too, if they need the
functionality. I don't see that as a good reason to keep two
implementations of basically the same thing.


Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to