Nuts, thank you. On 24 September 2014 14:28, Mike Bayer <mba...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > >> On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >>> On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> ... >>>> The problem is that the setuptools implementation of namespace packages >>>> breaks in a way that is repeatable but difficult to debug when a common >>>> OpenStack installation pattern is used. So the fix is “don’t do that” >>>> where I thought “that” meant the installation pattern and Sean thought it >>>> meant “use namespace packages”. :-) >>> >>> Stupid english... be more specific! >>> >>> Yeh, Doug provides the most concise statement of where we failed on >>> communication (I take a big chunk of that blame). Hopefully now it's a >>> lot clearer what's going on, and why it hurts if you do it. >> >> So... FWIW I think I've got a cleaner implementation of namespaces >> *for our context* - it takes inspiration from the PEP-420 discussion >> and final design. It all started when Mike reported issues with testr >> to me. >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1366869 > > I think you’ve got the wrong bug linked in here and your review, seems like > you meant this one: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1372250 > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
