On 30 September 2014 10:26, Linchengyong <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone help me? I have some questions to trouble .
>
> 1. Can the neutron create complex virtual network topology? Such as,
> any two routers' interconnection between each other.
>
Only if you bridge them with a network - direct connections are not
possible at the moment.
Something like:
169.254.169.1 169.254.169.2
R1 ------- BRIDGE ------- R2
|
|
INT_NET_1 INT_NET_2
Also neutron routers do not support at the moment dynamic routing
protocols, so you'll have to manage static routes (eg. INT_NET_1's cidr on
R2 via 169.254.169.1)
> 2. If can't, Does the neutron team have any plan to support the
> complex virtual network topology?
>
Neutron has plans for everything and the exact opposite! If you think it
should support more complex topologies - whatever that might mean - feel
free to share your ideas.
> 3. As we can't create the complex virtual network topology with the
> GUI, we are wondering whether the neutron has already supported the feature
> to create complex virtual network topology, but just constrained by the GUI?
>
I reckon Horizon pretty much allows for controlling most of neutron API
features. I'm not sure about static routes however.
>
>
> Thanks very much.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Chengyong Lin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
