Hello All,
In a nutshell, I've found the current IPMI Ceilometer sensor naming
structure difficult to deal with from a programmatic perspective if a
consumer wants to simply read all the sensors for a given Ironic Node.
The current naming scheme just doesn't seem to provide a simple fast way
to get all the sensors for a given Ironic Node from Ceilometer.
I detailed what I learned and proposed a potential alternative naming
structure to the Ironic/Ceilometer bugs as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1377157
I am curious as to what the intended use model was for the current
naming scheme?
Regards,
Jim
--
--- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com (US Mountain Time) ---
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
