Thanks Henry for moving forward the discussion in Neutron IPv6 meeting yesterday. Looking around the related bugs and reviews, I believe it sounds a good idea to disable PUT for IPv6_ra/address_mode attributes in Juno release.
Thanks, Akihiro On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Henry Gessau <ges...@cisco.com> wrote: > A number of bugs have been filed which are related to updating the > IPv6 attributes after a subnet has been created. > > In the reviews for the fixes for  and  some shortcomings and > questions have been raised, which were discussed in today's IPv6 IRC > meeting. > > Summary: > In Juno we are not ready for allowing the IPv6 attributes on a subnet to be > updated after the subnet is created, because: > - The implementation for supporting updates is incomplete. > - Perceived lack of usefulness, no good use cases known yet. > - Allowing updates causes more complexity in the code. > - Have not tested that radvd, dhcp, etc. behave OK after update. > > Therefore we are proposing to change 'allow_put' to False for the two IPv6 > attributes, ipv6_ra_mode and ipv6_address_mode. This will prevent the modes > from being updated via the PUT:subnets API. > > We would be interested to hear of any disagreements or questions. > > >  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1362966 >  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1363064 >  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1373417 >  https://review.openstack.org/125328 >  https://review.openstack.org/117799 >  > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-10-07-15.01.log.html > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Akihiro Motoki <amot...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev