On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Steve Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Running compute nodes as baremetal extensions of a different >> Corosync/Pacemaker cluster (presumably the one that manages the other >> Nova services) would potentially be an option, although vendors would >> need to buy into this. Ubuntu, for example, currently only ships >> pacemaker-remote in universe. > > This is something we'd be doing *too* OpenStack rather than *in* the > OpenStack projects (at least those that deliver code), in fact that's a large > part of the appeal. As such I don't know that there necessarily has to be one > true solution to rule them all, a distribution could deviate as needed, but > we would have some - ideally very small - number of "known good" > configurations which achieve the stated goal and are well documented.
Correct. In the infrastructure/service HA field, we already have that, as vendors (with very few exceptions) have settled on Corosync/Pacemaker for service availability, HAproxy for load balancing, and MySQL/Galera for database replication, for example. It would be great if we could see this kind of convergent evolution for guest HA as well. Cheers, Florian _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
