On 09:11 Thu 23 Oct , Flavio Percoco wrote: > According to the use-cases explained in this thread (also in the emails > from John and Mathieu) this is something that'd be good having. I'm > looking forward to seeing the driver completed. > > As John mentioned in his email, we should probably sync again in K-1 to > see if there's been some progress on the bricks side and the other > things this driver depends on. If there hasn't, we should probably get > rid of it and add it back once it can actually be full-featured.
I'm unsure if Brick [1] will be completed in time. With that in mind, even if we were to deprecate the glance driver for Kilo, Brick will likely be done by then and we would just be removing the deprecation in L, assuming the driver is completed in L. I think that would be confusing to users. It's unfortunate this was merged in the current state, but I would just say leave things as is with intentions at the latest to have the driver completed in L. If we're afraid no one is going to complete the driver, deprecate it now. [1] - https://github.com/hemna/cinder-brick -- Mike Perez _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
