On 10/27/2014 12:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
> start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
> the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think
> we should still bring it up) and also a bit about Cinder HA. I think
> these are things that will benefit from a f2f conversation with the
> OpenStack community at large.
> I also think that the biggest theme I see beyond that is UI/onboarding.
> So I think we should split the 2 40 minute sessions into these two
> things:
> * L3 Networking + Cinder HA
>  - Summary of changes needed in Cinder/Neutron/Nova/Ironic/etc.
>  - Configuration changes needed
>  - UI changes

I still have some reservations about these, as I noted in my previous
mail, but at this point I don't have an alternative suggestion so I
guess +1 from me.

> * TripleO's onramp - All things new contributor
>  - QuintupleO progress report

This should be pretty brief, unless someone else has done a bunch of
work on it that I'm not aware of.  Nothing has really changed on my end
since the blog post I made on this about a month ago.

>  - Tuskar progress report
>  - Alternative implementations roll call

Any one of these seems like a potential rabbit hole that could end up
taking the entire session.  I definitely think these are important
topics to discuss, but if we're going to try to fit them into one of the
sessions I think we need to be very, very clear about the scope of the
discussion.  With basically five topics in this session, each one has
less than 10 minutes available to it.  We're talking very brief
introduction and maybe a couple of questions here.

>    - Kolla
>    - Puppet
>    - Ansible
> The rest of the things in the etherpad will make for a good agenda for
> Friday.
> Does anyone have anything to add, or dissent to register?
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2014-10-16 13:14:26 -0700:
>> The format has changed slightly this summit, to help encourage a more
>> collaborative design experience, rather than rapid fire mass-inclusion
>> summit sessions. So we have two 40-minute long slots, and one whole day
>> of contributor meetup.[1]
>> Our etherpad topics page has received quite a few additions now [2], and
>> so I'd like to hear thoughts on what things we want to talk about in the
>> meetup versus the sessions.
>> A few things I think we should stipulate:
>> * The scheduled sessions will be heavily attended by the community at
>>   large. This often includes those who are just curious, or those who
>>   want to make sure that their voice is heard. These sessions should be
>>   reserved for those topics which have the most external influence or
>>   are the most dependent on other projects.
>> * The meetup will be at the end of the week so at the end of it, we
>>   can't then go to any other meetups and ask for things / participate
>>   in those design activities. This reinforces that scheduled session
>>   time should be focused on things that are externally focused so that
>>   we can take the result of those discussions into any of the sessions
>>   that are after.
>> * The Ops Summit is Wendesday/Thursday [3], which overlaps with these
>>   sessions. I am keenly interested in gathering more contribution from
>>   those already operating and deploying OpenStack. It can go both ways,
>>   but I think it might make sense to have more ops-centric topics
>>   discussed on Friday, when those participants might not be fully
>>   wrapped up in the ops sessions.
>> If we can all agree on those points, given the current topics, I think
>> our scheduled sessions should target at least (but not limited to):
>> * Cinder + CEPH
>> * Layer 3 segmentation
>> I think those might fit into 40 minutes, as long as we hash some things
>> out here on the mailing list first. Cinder + CEPH is really just a
>> check-in to make sure we're on track to providing it. Layer 3, I've had
>> discussions with Ironic and Neutron people and I think we have a plan,
>> but I wanted to present it in the open and discuss the short term goals
>> to see if it satisfies what users may want for the Kilo time frame.
>> So, I would encourage you all to look at the etherpad, and expand on
>> topics or add more, and then reply to this thread with ideas for how
>> best to use our precious time together.
>> [1] http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/tripleo
>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-tripleo-summit-topics
>> [3] http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops+summit
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to