Thanks for the feedback. OK, got it, nova networking is not a requirement for a CI. Then I'll see not a single reason to support it. We will investigate in the neutron way for our CI and also for production.
Now coming back to the Hypervisorsupportmatrix ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix ). I guess the scope of this matrix is only nova and not neutron,cinder,.. isn't it? So in this matrix I have to tick the networking lines (vlan, routing,..) as NOT supported, right? (as scope is neutron-networking, altough we would "support" it with neutron). Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas (irc: scheuran) On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 11:06 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are current nova CI platforms configured with > nova-networking or with > > neutron networking? Or is networking in general not even a > part of the > > nova CI approach? > > I think we have several that only run on Neutron, so I think > it's fine > to just do that. > > > Agreed, neutron should be considered required for all of the reasons > listed above. > > > --Dan > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
