On Nov 12, 2014, at 1:30 PM, David Kranz <dkr...@redhat.com> wrote: > Code has started going into tempest for several projects > (nova,neutron,keystone) to allow removal of xml support in kilo. There have > been many (heated) off and on threads on this list over the years. I'm sure > many projects would like to do this, but there is evidence that not all have > an understanding that this is ok. Is this a TC issue? If so, could there be a > clear statement about xml support?
Sean started a thread on the TC mailing list at the beginning of the year  which led to a discussion at the meeting on Jan 21 . The current documented policy for incubated projects is “at least a JSON entity representation” . Doug  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2014-January/000494.html  http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-01-21-20.03.log.html  http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/incubation-integration-requirements.rst#n51 _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev