On Nov 14, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/14/2014 05:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote: >> The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not >> need to be the PTL. By default, the liaison will be the PTL. > > ]Anyway, the outcome of the email exchange with Eoghan was that I recommended > he submit a core for the API liaison to start, and that I would raise the > issue on the ML to see if those conditions may be loosened to include > non-cores. And... here is that issue being raised :)
I’m totally fine with that. Ideally it’s the person who is the most passionate about the API from the team, regardless of core status. The current wording on the Cross-Project Liaisons page is "The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not need to be the PTL.” I think the key word there is _should_. Naturally, it’s preferable to want a core reviewer in this role because they have more say about what gets into the code base but it’s not an absolute must. We can loosen the wording further but I think it’s okay to proceed with a non-core reviewer, especially if that person is passionate about APIs. Everett _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
