Harm,

We were not able to enable dual stack with l3 routers in Juno release. You may 
need to wait for Kilo to see if that can be pushed in.




Xu Han 
—
Xu Han Peng (xuhanp)

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Harm Weites <h...@weites.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> We're running Juno since a few weeks now, is it now possible to go dual
> stack with l3-routers or are there some pieces missing and should I wait
> for Kilo?
> -Harm
> On 08/19/2014 07:08 PM, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) wrote:
>>
>> Hi Harm:
>>
>>  
>>
>> Unfortunately I haven’t had time to complete the changes yet. Even
>> if/when these changes are completed, it’s unlikely that this blueprint
>> will get approved for Juno, but I’ll see what I can do.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dane
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:*Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM
>> *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thiago,
>>
>> My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's
>> just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using L3
>> routers, which should be easy (dual stacked) to achieve once Dane's
>> work is completed.
>>
>> Did you find the time to commit those required changes for that yet Dane?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harm
>>
>> op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ジェームズ schreef:
>>
>>     Guys,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked
>>     environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6
>>     address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think)
>>     and the topology is `VLAN Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3
>>     Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router
>>     (also dual-stacked - still no radvd enabled).
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Thiago
>>
>>      
>>
>>     On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites <h...@weites.com
>>     <mailto:h...@weites.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Dane,
>>
>>     Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6
>>     addresses on
>>     gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work
>>     just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment?
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Harm
>>
>>     op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef:
>>
>>     > Hi Harm:
>>     >
>>     > Can you take a look at the following, which should address this:
>>     >   
>>      https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes
>>     >
>>     > There are some diffs out for review for this blueprint:
>>     >    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/
>>     > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6 addresses on a
>>     gateway port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon.
>>     >
>>     > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this
>>     blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get
>>     approved until K release.
>>     >
>>     > -Dane
>>     >
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com <mailto:h...@weites.com>]
>>     > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM
>>     > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>     > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>>     >
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the
>>     current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron
>>     got something like that on it's roadmap.
>>     >
>>     > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm
>>     unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network. What
>>     are the options, if any? To my knowledge it all comes down to
>>     supporting multiple exterior interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent,
>>     which is currently limited to just 1: either IP4 or IP6.
>>     >
>>     > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/
>>     > [2]
>>     >
>>     
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port
>>     >
>>     > Regards,
>>     > Harm
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>     > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>     > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>     OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>      
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>
>>     OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org 
>> <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to