Hi, Sebastian, Thank you for raising this topic again.
Yes, indeed, we need to move out from web.py as soon as possible and there are a lot of reasons why we should do it. But this topic is not about "Why", this topic is about "Flask or Pecan". Well, currently Fuel uses both of this frameworks: * OSTF is using Pecan * Fuel Stats is using Flask Personally, I'd like to use Flask instead of Pecan, because first one is more production-ready tool and I like its design. But I believe this should be resolved by voting. Thanks, Igor On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Sebastian Kalinowski <skalinow...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago we had a discussion about moving Nailgun to new web framework > . > > There was comparison  of two possible options: Pecan  and Flask . > We came to conclusion that we need to move Nailgun on some alive web > framework > instead of web.py  (some of the reasons: ) but there was no clear > agreement > on what framework (there were strong voices for Flask). > > I would like to bring this topic up again so we could discuss with broader > audience and > make final decision what will be our next web framework. > > I think that we should also consider to make that framework our "weapon of > choice" (or so > called standard) when creating new web services in Fuel. > > Best, > Sebastian > > >  https://lists.launchpad.net/fuel-dev/msg01397.html >  > https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1QR7YphyfN64m-e9b5rKC_U8bMtx4zjfW943BfLTqTao/edit?usp=sharing >  http://www.pecanpy.org/ >  http://flask.pocoo.org/ >  http://webpy.org/ >  https://lists.launchpad.net/fuel-dev/msg01501.html > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev