Being able to make some impact on Pecan is an advantage for sure. But there are 
other aspects in choosing a web framework and I’d rather discuss them.
Let’s not think about what is used in other OpenStack projects for a moment and 
discuss technical details.


> On 03 Dec 2014, at 15:53, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski wrote:
>> I think that as a part of OpenStack community we should stick with
>> Pecan and because of the same reason we can have a bigger impact how
>> future versions of Pecan will look.
> 
> Yes, this. ++
> 
> -jay
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to