Being able to make some impact on Pecan is an advantage for sure. But there are other aspects in choosing a web framework and I’d rather discuss them. Let’s not think about what is used in other OpenStack projects for a moment and discuss technical details.
> On 03 Dec 2014, at 15:53, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski wrote: >> I think that as a part of OpenStack community we should stick with >> Pecan and because of the same reason we can have a bigger impact how >> future versions of Pecan will look. > > Yes, this. ++ > > -jay > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev