On 12/09/2014 10:57 AM, Brad Topol wrote:
+1! Makes sense.
--Brad
Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Distinguished Engineer
OpenStack
(919) 543-0646
Internet: [email protected]
Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680
From: Morgan Fainberg <[email protected]>
To: Adam Young <[email protected]>, "OpenStack Development Mailing
List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]>
Date: 12/08/2014 06:07 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree that this library should not have “Keystone” in the name. This
is more along the lines of pycadf, something that is housed under the
OpenStack Identity Program but it is more interesting for general
use-case than exclusively something that is tied to Keystone specifically.
openstack-policy? osid-policy? It really should not position itself as
a standard. pycadf is more general purpose, but we are not looking to
replace all of the rules languages out there.
Cheers,
Morgan
--
Morgan Fainberg
On December 8, 2014 at 4:55:20 PM, Adam Young ([email protected]_
<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
The Policy libraray has been nominated for promotion from Oslo
incubator. The Keystone team was formally known as the Identity
Program, but now is Authentication, Authorization, and Audit, or AAA.
Does the prefeix OSAAA for the library make sense? It should not be
Keystone-policy.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
