On 12/09/2014 12:18 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I would like to propose that we keep the policy library under the oslo
program. As with other graduated projects we will maintain a core team
(that while including the oslo-core team) will be comprised of the
expected individuals from the Identity and other security related teams.
The change in direction is due to the policy library being more
generic and not exactly a clean fit with the OpenStack Identity
program. This is the policy rules engine, which is currently used by
all (or almost all) OpenStack projects. Based on the continued
conversation, it doesn’t make sense to take it out of the “common”
namespace.
Agreed. I think the original design was quite clean, and could easily be
used by projects not even in Open Stack. While we don't want to be
challenge any of the python based replacements for Prolog, the name
should reflect its general purpose.
Is the congress program still planning on using the same rules engine?
If there are no concerns with this change of direction we will update
the spec[1] to reflect this proposal and continue with the plans to
graduate as soon as possible.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140161/
--
Morgan Fainberg
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
