On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski <andrew.la...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> > On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications >> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve >> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and >> haven’t kept up with the review workload. >> >> Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We >> need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as >> abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our >> review comments. >> >> I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always >> super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or >> operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to >> approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. >> >> For reference, the specs to review may be found at: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova- >> specs+status:open,n,z >> >> Thanks heaps, >> Michael >> >> > It will be nice to have a good push before we hit the deadline. > > I would like to remind priority owners to update their list of any > outstanding specs at https://etherpad.openstack. > org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking so they can be targeted during the > review day. In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/141137 https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D-2%252cself+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&&Your+are+a+reviewer%2C+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-specs-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+No+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback%2C+No+Negative+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+limit%3A100&Wayward+Changes+%28Changes+with+no+code+review+in+the+last+7+days%29=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D2+age%3A7d&Some+negative+feedback%2C+might+still+be+worth+commenting=label%3ACode-Review%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3D-2+limit%3A100&Dead+Specs=label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-2 > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
